However, during Friday’s hearing, Hamdard’s lawyer pointed out that instead of removing the YouTube video as directed, Ramdev’s team had merely made it private.Ramdev’s counsel responded by saying his client had “great respect for the court” and that its directions would be obeyed, also asking the court to dispose of the case. The court directed Ramdev’s legal team to file a formal affidavit the same day, and noted that a similar undertaking had been submitted by Patanjali Foods Ltd. The matter is now listed for May 9.The controversy began on April 3 when Ramdev, while promoting Patanjali’s Gulab Sharbat, launched an attack on Hamdard’s Rooh Afza, accusing the company of using its profits to fund religious institutions like mosques and madrasas, and used the term “sharbat jihad” in the video.
Source link
