During the arguments, the counsel appearing for the accused had said anyone can be said to be member of the syndicate if the arguments of the prosecution are to be accepted.Kavitha Lankesh’s counsel had argued that the high court had erred in coming to the conclusion that KCOCA was not applicable against the accused. He referred to the role of the accused, as noted in the high court order, and said it was alleged he had taken a house on rent in the guise of running an acupressure clinic but it was meant to accommodate members of the syndicate.In its order, the high court had said, “If the approval order itself is bad in law, the sanction order, the charge sheet and the approval order so far as the offences under the Act (KCOCA) against the petitioner (Nayak) have no legs to stand.”
Source link
ट्रंप कहते हैं कि अमेरिका अफगानिस्तान में बग्रम एयरफील्ड को तालिबान से वापस पाने की कोशिश कर रहा है।
अमेरिकी राष्ट्रपति डोनाल्ड ट्रम्प ने गुरुवार को कहा कि उनकी सरकार “बाग्रम एयरफील्ड” को वापस पाने की कोशिश…
