By 10 May, Pakistan had launched what Indian officials described as its “most ambitious and wide-ranging attacks,” prompting a forceful Indian response. The Indian Air Force retaliated with precision strikes on eight major Pakistani airbases, including Chaklala, Rafiqui, Murid, Rahim Yar Khan, Chunian, and Sialkot. The damage was significant, with sources confirming that the runway at the Rahim Yar Khan airbase was devastated, impairing Pakistan’s operational capabilities. “These strikes sent a clear message: if Pakistan escalates, India will respond in kind—but on its own terms, and with calibrated intensity,” pointed out a source.However, this approach brings heightened international scrutiny, particularly from countries such as the United States.US President Donald Trump’s recurring comments about mediating in Kashmir are viewed as deeply problematic. There is also concern that the growing visibility of India’s military responses could draw unwanted conflation between counter-terrorism and other bilateral issues. But Indian policymakers maintain that terrorism is not a bilateral issue—it is a global security threat, and India has the right to act against it, like anyone else.Indian officials maintain that Operation Sindoor achieved all its intended objectives military, political, and psychological. Terror infrastructure was hit, and Pakistan’s cost for backing terrorism was raised.
Source link
