What do you think of November 20 definition of the Aravallis given by the Supreme Court?It was entirely unscientific. I believe that the Aravalli should be defined in terms of geology rather than height. During my work as a member of the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel, we defined the Western Ghats based on geological characteristics and not just elevation.The Supreme Court’s November 20 decision was ecologically untenable. I wonder how a judgment could operationalise mining while leaving areas above 100 meters intact. It appeared to be designed for mining and development purposes.Based on your conservation work, how do the Aravallis function ecologically, and how would mining affect them?The Aravallis act as a natural barrier, slowing the spread of the Thar Desert toward the Gangetic plains, and recharging aquifers. The Aravallis have immense potential for recharging groundwater, estimated to produce about 2 million liters/hectare of the landscape. Because Aravalli aquifers are interconnected, any disruption can destabilise the groundwater system, worsening drought in the already water-stressed Delhi-NCR. Proposed open-cast mining, not underground extraction, would cause irreversible damage—destroying habitats, fragmenting wildlife corridors used by leopards and hyenas, and degrading scrub forests and native tree cover vital for reptiles, pollinators, and grassland birds. Redefining the Aravallis also undermines their crucial role as a regional aquifer.
Source link
सालों से पी रहे हैं सिगरेट? तो घबराएं नहीं, अपनाएं ये तरीका, आसानी से छूट जाएगी यह लत – उत्तर प्रदेश समाचार
सिगरेट छोड़ना किसी भी उम्र में फायदेमंद होता है. गाजियाबाद की डाइटिशियन डॉ. शिवानी असवाल के अनुसार मजबूत…
