Close to 75 years after the appearance of Communist China  right next to a two-year-old fledgling Indian Republic, the triangle of  conflicting interests and insecurities over the “dragon nation”, where the United  States, India and Europe had once collided, remains intact. Former foreign  secretary Vijay Gokhale’s  (2018-2020) fourth book on China offers a fascinating retelling of how a young  India had then navigated the choppy waters of big-power diplomacy.    While Great Britain, still avowedly an ally of the US, was  surreptitiously trying to secure its commercial interests in a China rapidly  being overrun by Mao Zedong’s Communists, American interests, with respect to  the Cold War, were primarily strategic. India was somewhere in-between, but  leaning towards the Chinese out of sympathy for a fellow oppressed people.    Today, as the conflict over India’s disputed border with  China in the Himalayas and the far more global contest over the South China Sea  simmers, one can spy a similar pattern. The US has singled out China and is  trying to capture the global supply chain by isolating “the nation of the  descendants of dragons”. Its European allies continue to pay lip service to American  goals but have increased both their trade with and investment into the Asian  powerhouse. But India again remains  in the middle.    This is even as it is leaning towards the US this time, being  part of the informal pact called the Quad. Our trade with Beijing also reached  a “record high” of $136.2bn in 2023, (according to the Chinese charge d’affairs  in Delhi). At the same time, India has taken pains to underline at every  possible opportunity that the US-led Quad is not ranged “against China”. (However,  that has been placed under doubt as the US and Australia, both members of the  Quad, have also joined AUKUS, along with Great Britain, to possibly preserve  Western interests in the Indo-Pacific.)    Gokhale points out that in April 1949,  when the British warship, Amethyst, was shelled by Communists as it was  sailing up the Yangtze river towards Nanking, the British sought to carry the  Indian government with it and gain their support for the “powerful effect on  public opinion throughout Asia”. This probably marked the beginning of a  strange waltz where the Chinese dragon, American eagle, Indian elephant and the  aging British lion were partners.    By the spring of 1949, Chiang Kai-shek’s National Government  was rapidly fading away. It was but a matter of time before the Kuomintang  surrendered their very capital at Nanking to Mao’s victorious soldiers. Great  Britain wanted to build bridges to protect its business interests in China and  its enclave in Hong Kong, by recognising the new Communist regime as the de  facto government but did not wish to annoy its American allies who were dead  against the Maoists. India was advanced by the British as the local power that  wants to parley with Chinese Communists which, they argued, would leave little  room for it not to go ahead and cut a similar deal with Beijing. All the cards  fell in place — India and Britain recognising Mao’s China and the Americans  salvaging Chiang Kai-shek’s tattered KMT forces.      In the midst of all this, Gokhale reveals  that Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru very presciently wrote a memo about the  possibility of the Chinese invasion of Tibet resulting in “the Chinese or  Tibetan Communists (coming) right up on our Assam, Bhutan and Sikkim border”. However,  China’s foreign minister Zhou Enlai managed to pull the wool over Indian  ambassador K.M. Panikker’s eyes and convince him “that there were no  differences between India and China and that he was anxious to safeguard in  every way Indian interests in Tibet”.    Fast forward to the 1950s, when independent India and its  charismatic leader Nehru remained important chess pieces as the “great game” in  the Far East unfolded. As China-supported Viet Minh soldiers won in North  Vietnam led by Ho Chi Minh in their fight against French colonial rule and  occupying Japanese forces, the Americans contemplated engaging the Communists  in Indo-China (read Southeast Asia) militarily even as they tried to hastily  cobble together an anti-Communist front at a meeting in Manila. Nehru again was  the “key to Asia” in the eyes of US leadership. His refusal to join the meeting  in Manila or any new Cold War alliance was thus a cause for much bitterness in  Washington.    The Indian Prime Minister also baulked at British advice that  India recognise the South Vietnamese regime headed by Bao Dai set up by the  French and correctly predicted that the Communist revolution against French  colonial rule would go the China way.    Gokhale, who has earlier written three  books on China, Tiananmen Square: The  Making of a Protest, The Long Game  and After Tiananmen, analyses the great power equation  and India’s attempts at mediation in the two crises over the Taiwan Strait in  1954-55 and 1958, respectively. These were defused by a combination of  belligerence and threat to use force by the US, and direct diplomacy. The Indian  effort led by V.K. Krishna Menon, Nehru’s foreign minister, was largely  unsuccessful.    On the whole, the book offers us a reminder that the present  may be equally difficult to weather as the storms over China gather afresh. Even as the US and China lock horns over Taiwan  once again and extend that rivalry over the Pacific, hitherto an “American pond”,  India faces the Middle Kingdom in its familiar stomping grounds of the high  Himalayas. The attempts to oust Indian influence in Sri Lanka and the Maldives  by Beijing and the signing of treaties by littoral states giving China rights  over ports in the Indian Ocean are also threats that India cannot ignore. India’s  growing commercial and energy interests also mean that it has a vital stake in  keeping the Taiwan Strait and the wider South China Sea free for international  shipping.    As in the 1950s, one thing the Chinese would not be keen on would  be to open two separate fronts — in the Himalayas and the Strait of Taiwan —  and therein lies India’s key to stability and peace.    The writer is a senior journalist        Crosswinds:  Nehru, Zhou and the Anglo-American Competition over China    By Vijay Gokhale    Penguin    pp. 235; Rs 699
Source link 
                राहुल गांधी के ‘10% के नियंत्रण में सेना’ वाले बयान ने एक नई विवाद को जन्म दिया है
कांग्रेस सांसद राहुल गांधी ने अपने विवादास्पद बयान से एक नई विवाद को जन्म दिया है, जिसमें उन्होंने…

